Kudo’s to Focus on the Family and the Tebow family for being willing to share their story.
Every once in a while, instead of a “clicki, vidi, linki” post, I like to review some things of interest (to me) that happened throughout the course of the past week.
As you may already know, this week marked 7 years of marriage for Em and Me. To celebrate we left Sunday afternoon and took a whirlwind trip up to Myrtle Beach, stayed at a nice hotel, went horseback riding on the beach, and visited a couple of our Marines at Camp Lejeune all before making it back in time for Wednesday night ministry. Here are my observations from the trip:
Myrtle Beach is almost a ghost town in February.
Horseback riding on the beach on your anniversary is awesome!
Ty Pennington
When you have a beard and “Ty Pennington” hair (somebody else said it, not me), you stick out at a Marine base.
So there you have it…everything you never wanted to know about this weeks anniversary excursion to South Carolina.
Posted in Life Events | Tagged Anniversary, Camp Lejeune, Myrtle Beach, observations, road trip | Leave a Comment »
If I were rating this book on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being the best) I would have to rate this book as a 1. As I’ve stated in the previous chapter reviews I felt that what good points the authors tried to raise were almost immediately sullied by weak if not wrong bible interpretation, an emphasis on human philosophy over Biblical theology, and some distorted if not revisionist interpretations of church history. This is not to say that some of the charges they lay against the church of the 20th century are not correct or that all of their ideas and observations are wrong. The fact that they do make some correct statements makes this book even more dangerous. As Satan proved in Eden the best way to deceive is to mix a little truth into the lie. I do not doubt that the authors had only good intentions at heart as they wrote this book, but good intentioned falsehoods are no less falsehoods.
Best Chapter in the Book: Missing the Point: Sin
Worst Chapter in the Book: Close race between all the rest, but Missing the Point: Theology wins by a nuance.
Most Alarming Quote: After describing how Bono is being used by God to move this world toward the kingdom of God the author states that the church is
“still God’s best chance at showcasing what the whole world will become when the kingdom of God becomes fully actualized.“
Best chance? Is God sitting at a roulette table in heaven saying “Put all my chips on the church!”
One Final Observation: This book seems to be an over-reaction against what are thought to be negative traits in modernism (and maybe capitalism, conservatism, and fundamentalism). The a healthy reaction to these negative traits is good…but a healthy reaction this book is not (in this readers opinion).
Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged Adventures in Missing the Point, book review, Brian McLaren, Tony Campolo | Leave a Comment »
As I traversed through the book “Adventures in Missing the Point” I found myself getting more and more frustrated as time and again the authors would go from making valid points to giving invalid arguments based on faulty premises or downright wrong theology. Having just finished a mostly ambiguous chapter on homosexuality I braced myself for the chapter “Missing the Point: Sin”.
The author begins by sharing how St. Augustine dealt with a specific sin in his congregation. Augustine dealt with this, not in by promoting gossip or judgmental attitudes but by reminding his congregation of 2 Corinthians 11:28 where Paul states communicates that even the most revered of apostles is not immune from the temptations of sin. The author, Brian McLaren (whose name I mention because this is a positive post), presents this question: “How will I respond to the faults and failings and sins of my sister and brother Christians?”
That question, and not so much a Biblical/theological look at sin itself, is the foundation of this chapter, and McLaren provides some good mental prodding in this area. Something that I have observed throughout my ministry even within my thinking is the tendancy of many believers to, as I remember my dad saying, shoot their own wounded. Or in other words when a brother or sister in Christ falls into sin we react by turning our back on them and/or condemning them instead of helping them to get back on their feet, find forgiveness in Christ and gain victory over what Satan means for defeat.
At this point I must make clear something that is unfortunately not clear and actually missing from this chapter. I am not talking about the person who refuses to acknowledge his/her sin and continues to live rebelliously in it. There is a proper way to deal with that type of person – witness to them passionately as you would any other unsaved friend.
But for the brother/sister who is struggling, even stumbling in sin I urge an attitude that reflects what McLaren is trying to communicate in his concluding paragraph:
don’t distance yourself from them or their weakness. Don’t miss the point by condemning them. Empathize instead. Draw close. Like Augustine, identify with your weak brother or sister, because you’re [ultimately] no different. And believe that just as you have by grace survived “many dangers, toil, and snares,” they can survive too. For we serve a God who says, “My power is made perfect in weakness”.
Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged Adventures in Missing the Point, Brian McLaren, Grace, Sin | Leave a Comment »
This weeks Clicki, Vidi, Linki (I clicked, I saw, I linked) is dedicated to the one social issue that those who preach a social gospel seem most silent on. In the book “Adventures in Missing the Point” by Mclaren and Campolo, the authors took the church to task for not being “liberal enough” (my words) in major issues that coincidentally align themselves with one particular political ideology. They say that the church has missed the point on these social issues (environmentalism, homosexuality, suffrage etc.) and in some areas they are right (and in other ways horribly off base). But time and again this one issue is given but a passing glance. This one issue deals with the one group of people that for the past several decades now have been the most oppressed with few to speak on their behalf, and many seeking their extermination.
Who are these people? What is this issue that seems so often neglected by the social gospel crowd? The people are the unborn, and the issue is the horriffic act of abortion.
This is on my mind recently because of the gall of the N.O.W. to attack an upcoming (hopefully) Superbowl ad celebrating the life of Tim Tebow, a life that if his mom had heeded her doctors advice wouldn’t exist.
Now, I do believe that in some ways the church has missed the point when it comes to abortion. They are absolutely correct in asserting it is evil and an evidence of the sinfulness of mankind. They are correct in promoting life and discouraging the culture of death surrounding the Planned Parenthood agenda. But alas, where some and fortunately not all, miss the point is that the issue dies when the baby is born. Promoting life needs to start at conception and continue at all stages of life!
Where I believe the social gospelers (and this is my stereotype I know) miss the point is in for a practical purposes ignoring it lest, I propose, they fall out of favor with their favorite political party. (Proposing such lunacies as reduce the number of abortions by making it legal)
With that I leave you with a few more links:
Mugged by the Ultrasound – by Al Mohler
Posted in Clicki Vidi Linki, Culture | Tagged abortion, Clicki Vidi Link, Gospel, Life, Philosophy, Tim Tebow | 2 Comments »
The author of the second chapter (Missing the Point: Theology) starts by stating that “everyone is a theologian.” This is not necessarily a false statement as everyone from the atheist to the highly religious person has a set of beliefs about God, and as the author points out, this is, in its most basic form, theology. From that premise the author states that everyone tends to “absolutize” their own theology, convincing themselves that their own systems of belief that they have constructed are The Truth. That’s not a bad statement either, especially if we’re dealing with people who create their own theologies rather than testing their theology against Scripture. The author goes on, after referring to God as him or her, to state:
“Far from any individual’s theology being The Right One, in one sense all theologies are heresies. For theologies, like heresies, are major or minor distortions of the truth.”
Then, after taking 1 Corinthians 13:9-10 out of context he continues:
“In other words, what you believe may be partly correct, but it is certainly not completely correct. The point? We must always be open to further insights that will give us fuller understanding of what God is all about.”
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the beginnings of deadly heresy. First of all, the authors premise is quite faulty. For starters, if a theology is a distortion of the truth it no longer becomes a good theology but in actuality a heresy. An accurate theology will survive the scrutiny of Scripture. If there is error within the theology then the error must be removed lest it contaminate the whole thing. For example, the errors found within this foundational chapter can be seen in the way other subjects are approached throughout this book. Secondly, while I understand the (not quite true) point that he’s trying to make, the author then leaves scripture all but out of the solution. He states:
“Let’s get one thing straight. The one certainty against which all our theologies are guesswork. ‘This one thing I know,’ the apostle Paul wrote: Jesus and how his crucifixion delivered us from sin, and how his resurrection assures us of eternal life.”
That certainly is a good starting point, but the author makes it an ending point. As long as a person affirms that, all other parts of theology become relative. Apparently everything else that is said in Scripture about all aspects of God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, Sin, Salvation, Sanctification, Angels, the Church and End Times are up reinterpretation based on what current culture is predominate (He uses examples of liberation theology and black theology). He also assumes that all (certainly there are some that are…for example, this book) theology is “guesswork.” The god of a guesswork theology is a god who thought his holy word would be a good way to reveal himself to his creation, but discovered too late that it was to0 foggy to be accurately understood.
So for the majority of the chapter I’m looking at this relativistic quagmire but then at the end the author (finally) makes this statement:
“Although Scripture can be interpreted in countless ways, it remains the sole authority to which all theologians must answer. In the end, all Christians need to make a biblical case for their own claims.”
I think the chapter would have been better if he had just written that paragraph because it doesn’t line up with everything else that was said. Because of the seeming relativistic view of theology and the inconsistencies of the writing, I could not in clear conscience suggest that any new believer or person struggling with theology read this chapter.
Posted in Book Reviews, Doctrinal Issues | Tagged Adventures in Missing the Point, heresy, Relativism, Theology | Leave a Comment »
Chapter 1 titled “Missing the Point: Salvation”. The author of this chapter lays out that the church has potentially missed the point by becoming overly decision oriented (my terminology). He points out that terms like “accept Christ as your personal Savior” and “sinners prayer” are not found in the Bible. He points out, accurately I think, that for many salvation is seen as a decision one made, rather than a new life to be lived (again, my terminology). So, if this is the main point of chapter 1 then we agree.
In the process of making his point however, the author goes down an interesting road. He attempts to make the case that in the Old Testament salvation was not seen primarily as being saved from God’s just wrath toward sin, but being saved from oppression, whether it be from the Egyptians, a cruel king (David and Saul), or from wicked empires. The author states that when the angel announced to Joseph that Jesus would “save his people from their sins” it was the “first time in Jewish history, a promised salvation was not liberation from political oppression and religious persecution.” This just isn’t true. It is true that the political climate of the day fostered the “political messiah” idea, but Christ rebuked the Pharisees for not understanding that the Messiah was one who would save from the devastating consequences of sin (John 3) and restore a people to a joyous and satisfying relationship with God (See Isaiah 53 for starters).
Before concluding with a parable that I find a bit “straw-man-esque”, the author makes these remarks (each quote followed by my thoughts):
“So there’s an ancient Jewish way of missing the point (thinking salvation is only about politics and the here and now)”
Absolutely…and not too different from the way some Christians today seem to view salvation.
“and the modern Christian way of missing the point (thinking salvation is only about escaping hell after you die).”
That may be a bit of a generalization, but still those who think this would be missing the Biblical point of salvation. Plus I would add that my main issue here is not about escaping hell per-se it’s about fleeing the wrath that is to come – the wrath of God poured out against all unrighteousness. The paradox is that we flee God’s wrath by running to God via Christ!
“There’s another approach: that salvation means being rescued from fruitless ways of life here and now, to share in God’s saving love for all creation, in an adventure called the kingdom of God, the point of which you definitely don’t want to miss.”
Now what I like about that statement is that it implies the concept that the pleasures of this life are a fruitless enterprise and only through salvation can we find that fullness of joy forevermore. But I find the statement somewhat empty. Where is God’s grace? Where is God’s wrath juxtaposed with God’s love? Where is the point that salvation is ultimately not about me at all, but about God’s glory? Without recognizing who we were, where we came from and where we were heading; we cannot fully grasp the impact of who God has made us, the new course He has given us and the final rest He has promised us.
To sum up allow me to adapt a quote from Douglas Wilson on his blog: As is so often the case with those who suggest a recasting of doctrine, the problem is not so much with what the author proposes to add to our understanding, but what he wants to take away, or unintentionally omit.
Posted in Book Reviews, Doctrinal Issues, Philosophical Thoughts | Tagged Adventures in Missing the Point, Bible Doctrine, Salvation, Theology | Leave a Comment »
I’m reading through the book “Adventures in Missing the Point”, which is NOT about proper evasive techniques for sword fighting. Actually, that would probably be a more useful book. This book, written by Tony Campolo and Brian McLaren, has an absolutely wonderful subtitle: “How the culture-controlled church neutered the gospel.”
I picked this book up at the local library and that subtitle caught my eye as I find myself agreeing with the premise of that statement. Therefore I dove in hoping to put aside my differences and see some good theological/practical looks at how to counteract this age-old dilemma. As I began reading I found myself nodding in agreement as they asked questions like these:
“Are our churches and broadcasts and books and organizations merely creating religious consumers of religious products and programs? Are we creating a self-isolating, self-serving, self-perpetuating, self-centered subculture instead of a world-penetrating, world-serving, world-transforming, God-centered counterculture?”
And so the authors begin to note that perhaps many in modern Christianity have “missed the point” and introduce the book as a conversation to bring us back to a right understanding of Christianity. Unfortunately I didn’t get out of the introduction before red flags started appearing.
Red flag #1 is what I will call and attempt to pre-empt criticism. Unfortunately throughout my life I have become a master of the guilt-trip (something I continually work at not using) and can recognize one a mile away. A phrase like “shame on you if you use this book to critique others” smacks of a guilt trip…and becomes ironic when within three chapters the authors are using their book to critique others (I have no problem with critiquing). They also state that if you think that the authors might have missed a point that you are actually being a person who is missing an opportunity to learn, reflect and grow. Therefore within the first chapters I find myself excluded from the “conversation” because I would like to critique faulty premises and theology. I must be someone who doesn’t want to learn, reflect or grow (three of my personal reasons for blogging btw).
Red flag #2 I will call the “join me on the bandwagon of my own ignorance/insecurities” red flag (apologies to Taylor Mali). When an author states that “this adventure is about finding our own blindnesses” or “We don’t claim to see all that much” I begin to wonder why they’re writing the book. The red flag was waving, but as I learned in my years in the corporate world (yeah McDonald’s management classes) assume innocence. Therefore I chalked that up to the authors showing humility and not wanting us to think they had all the answers. Personally however, I have a respect for a person who seeks to answer questions not simply ask them. Hence the red flag.
But these were simply red flags that I hoped might be the product of my pre-made assumptions and/or suspicions. But it didn’t take long before the authors let me down…again and again and again. In the first three chapters the authors present a very man-centered salvation, a relative view of theology and an incredible minute view of who God is, and while the reader is not supposed to critique others, the authors feel free to critique others (under the guise of asking questions of course).
As I continue to read the book I shall continue to include you in some of my thinking processes. As is becoming my policy, I wont state which of the authors made which quote as my desire is to look at the quote itself and not potentially demonize the author.
Posted in Book Reviews, Philosophical Thoughts | Tagged Brian McLaren, Missing the point, Theology, Tony Campolo | Leave a Comment »
Aside from the quotes, book review and receipt fail here on this blog this week, here are a few other links worth clicking.
Over at Teampyro, Phil Johnson writes an astute post on “The Lie of Liberal Theology.” This is a good warm-up article before heading over to 9marks and reading and/or printing out their January/February ejournal dedicated to unmasking liberal theology.
Justin Taylor posted a typography version of this video over at his blog:
An oldie, but a goodie. I’m thinking of using this as a “parable” in a review for a book I’m currently reading.
Oh yes…and now you can become a fan of divinesatisfaction.com on Facebook! Why? Not sure…but everybody’s doing it, which is always a good reason to do things, yes?
Posted in Clicki Vidi Linki | Tagged Justin Taylor, liberal theology, links, Phil Johnson, Pyromaniacs, Taylor Mali | Leave a Comment »